Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #629, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/20/15 12:55:41 (9 years ago)
Author:
efge@…

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #629, comment 2

    v1 v2  
    11(I'm not the original submitter)
    22
    3 I'm asking for this to be reopened because the option `ignore_invalid_headers` actually ignores headers which are valid. A period is a valid header field. Per RFC 2730 (HTTP 1.1 Message Syntax and Routing) (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230) we have:
     3I'm asking for this to be reopened because the default behavior actually ignores headers which are valid. A period is a valid header field. Per RFC 2730 (HTTP 1.1 Message Syntax and Routing) (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230) we have:
    44- 3.2: header-field = field-name ":" OWS field-value OWS
    55- 3.2: field-name = token