#945 closed defect (wontfix)
when setting master_process off, nginx segmentation fault when sent mutiple HUP singals
Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | documentation | Version: | 1.9.x |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
uname -a: | |||
nginx -V: |
nginx version: nginx/1.9.13
built by gcc 5.3.0 (GCC) configure arguments: --prefix=/tmp/nginx |
Description
A simple configuration is shown below:
worker_processes 1; master_process off; daemon off; events { worker_connections 1024; } http { include mime.types; default_type application/octet-stream; sendfile on; keepalive_timeout 65; server { listen 1200; server_name localhost; location / { root html; index index.html index.htm; } } }
After starting nginx process, send multiple HUP signals to it, it will segmentation fault:
watch -n 1 'kill -HUP PID'
After inspecting the core, I found the code dereference a NULL pointer which leads the process segmentation fault:
(gdb) frame #0 0x00000000004194e7 in ngx_clean_old_cycles (ev=0x6a5c00 <ngx_cleaner_event>) at src/core/ngx_cycle.c:1313 1313 if (cycle[i]->connections[n].fd != (ngx_socket_t) -1) { (gdb) bt #0 0x00000000004194e7 in ngx_clean_old_cycles (ev=0x6a5c00 <ngx_cleaner_event>) at src/core/ngx_cycle.c:1313 #1 0x0000000000425f09 in ngx_event_expire_timers () at src/event/ngx_event_timer.c:94 #2 0x0000000000425b87 in ngx_process_events_and_timers (cycle=cycle@entry=0x1687010) at src/event/ngx_event.c:256 #3 0x000000000042ca91 in ngx_single_process_cycle (cycle=0x1687010, cycle@entry=0x138f480) at src/os/unix/ngx_process_cycle.c:309 #4 0x000000000040c615 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at src/core/nginx.c:364 (gdb) p i $10 = 1 (gdb) p n $11 = 0 (gdb) p cycle[1]->connections[0] Cannot access memory at address 0x0 (gdb) p cycle[1]->connections $12 = (ngx_connection_t *) 0x0 (gdb)
nginx version: nginx/1.9.13 built by gcc 5.3.0 (GCC) configure arguments: --prefix=/tmp/nginx Linux tianchaijz 4.4.3-1 #12 SMP PREEMPT Sun Feb 28 17:55:31 CST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Thanks!
One more question, why not ignore the HUP signal when there is no master process rather than leave the nginx process in an inconsistent state?
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
There are no reasons to ignore configuration reloads without a master process as they shouldn't happen except during nginx development in the first place. And because there are already parts which work, and probably at some point configuration reloads will be fully working even when there is no master process.
The master_process directive is only expected to be used for development. Avoid using it unless you understand what you are doing and associated limitations. As of now nginx doesn't survive configuration reloads without separate master process, it simply doesn't work and leaves nginx in an inconsistent state, with segfault expected sooner or later.