Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#9465 closed enhancement
Update to FriCAS 1.1.0 — at Version 13
Reported by: | hemmecke | Owned by: | AlexGhitza |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | packages: experimental | Keywords: | fricas |
Cc: | hemmecke, rws | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Ralf Hemmecke | Reviewers: | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
The earlier upgrade is in #9354
Also look at #6517 for more information.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/hemmecke/pub/fricas-1.1.0.spkg
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/hemmecke/pub/fricasaldor-1.1.0.spkg
fricasaldor might not properly work on 64 bit machines or might not work at all.
Link to project: http://sourceforge.net/projects/fricas/
Change History (13)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
- Cc hemmecke added
- Description modified (diff)
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
- Component changed from algebra to packages
- Milestone set to sage-5.0
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
for the record, fricas-1.0.9 spkg fails to install in Sage 4.8 on x86_64 Linux (Debian).
comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 10 years ago by
Why are you considering 1.0.9? Above you find a link to 1.1.0. and FriCAS progressed to 1.1.5.
However, in 1.1.5 the aldor-interface is broken. It's already fixed in trunk, but I tend to wait till 1.1.6 is released in order to produce a new spkg.
Furthermore, quickly browsing over my spkg generation scripts, tells me, that I will have to fix some small issues.
BTW, is it still required that FriCAS for Sage must use ECL and not SBCL?
Ralf
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to hemmecke:
Why are you considering 1.0.9? Above you find a link to 1.1.0. and FriCAS progressed to 1.1.5.
I was just pointing out that an upgrade is needed badly.
However, in 1.1.5 the aldor-interface is broken. It's already fixed in trunk, but I tend to wait till 1.1.6 is released in order to produce a new spkg.
Furthermore, quickly browsing over my spkg generation scripts, tells me, that I will have to fix some small issues.
BTW, is it still required that FriCAS for Sage must use ECL and not SBCL?
Was it ever required? I guess it was never assumed that SBCL is installed on the system, so by default FriCAS can fall back on ECL provided by Sage. (This would need a trivial adjustment of the spkg-install, I suppose).
On the other hand a fast interface to FriCAS would need an embeddable Lisp, and ECL fits this bill.
Dima
Ralf
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by
- Component changed from packages: standard to packages: experimental
comment:12 Changed 7 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:13 Changed 7 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Would you like to make an spkg with current Fricas? I'll make sure to review it, etc. Thanks!